{"id":61528,"date":"2026-01-15T10:00:43","date_gmt":"2026-01-15T16:00:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/?p=61528"},"modified":"2026-01-16T20:10:01","modified_gmt":"2026-01-17T02:10:01","slug":"against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\/","title":{"rendered":"Against Babel: Or, How to Talk to Strangers"},"content":{"rendered":"

There\u2019s a story most classicists know, told in the appendices of textbooks or on the first day of Latin 101: once upon a time, let\u2019s say 12th-ish century BCE, there was a people who lived somewhere around the Black Sea who had a language, a religion, and a distinctive aesthetic, all of which we\u2019ll call \u201cproto-Indo-European.\u201d One day, something happened\u2014a flood, a drought, an earthquake, a dust storm\u2014that forced their migration, splitting these once-unified people into different continental forms. Some of them landed in India, where they blended their own linguistic and cultural tics with those of an indigenous population, thereby producing Sanskrit. Others landed in Greece and Rome, where they developed Greek and Latin. In the eras that followed, these divided proto-Indo-Europeans bore more nations, more children, more tongues, including Lithuanian, Old English, Russian, and Hindi. Sometimes these forebearers of about 40 percent of our modern languages are just called \u201cthe Indo-Europeans,\u201d other times, \u201cthe Yamnaya,\u201d and still other times, \u201cthe Aryans.\u201d \u201cLook<\/em>,\u201d an eager instructor will tell you, \u201cm\u1e17t\u0113r\/m\u0101t\u0101\u0301\/mater, that\u2019s \u2018mother\u2019 in Greek\/Sanskrit\/Latin; pater\/pita\/pater, that\u2019s \u2018father\u2019; t\u00fa\/tuv\u00e1m\/t\u016b, that\u2019s \u2018you\u2019; em\u00e9\/m\u0101m\/m\u0113, that\u2019s \u2018me.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

This pedagogical performance reminds us that we were once one; and you, by the end of the class, will be part of each other\u2019s oneness too. For most students, it won\u2019t be their first \u201cepisode of the scattered tongues\u201d but an empirically authorized version of Babel, the tower this time brought down to the dimensions of verifiable life. But this story of proto-Indo-European, unlike Babel, is a happy tale, one that restores agency and civic duty to today\u2019s new humanists. As the story directs, philology and comparative linguistics have offered lenses through which we can see, at last, the perforated and torn seams of our ancient selves, which we might then stitch back together. Under the shade of the language tree, for a moment, nations dissipate, borders are undrawn, Babel\u2019s spire still scrapes the underbelly of Heaven.<\/p>\n

The question raised by the possibility of these common descents has been issued generation and generation anew: What exactly are we to do with the spoils of our shared past? What do we make of the people and languages that have always lived outside these forms? How do we speak together, live together, write together, in Babel\u2019s wake?<\/p>\n

But the political stakes of such questions have become increasingly urgent. Indo-European Studies was built upon colonial foundations, unearths Siraj Ahmed in a recent, masterful monograph, The Archaeology of Babel.<\/em> And that, in turn, reveals that philology and comparative literature writ large were built upon colonialism too. Ahmed shows how philology emerged as an authority during the British Raj, as a tool for recovering lost histories.<\/p>\n

This Raj philology, epitomized in the figure of Sir William Jones, laundered, legitimized, and thus fabulated a certain myth of ancient India that bought into partitioned ideologies and ultimately delivered Hindutva hegemony. As Jones reconstructed it, India had always been inhabited by nature-worshipping polytheists who were wedded to a singular religion, Hinduism; the intrusion of the Mughals and their Islamic practice was an unwarranted interruption to the subcontinent\u2019s naturalized literary identity. Ahmed declares, \u201cA dialectical response to colonial history must seek, therefore, neither for a return to philology nor for a future philology but rather for a way out. It would need to search, in other words, between the lines of the received tradition for what philology has effaced.\u201d1<\/a><\/sup> This demand\u2014to refuse methodological futurity and embrace disciplinary abolition\u2014has, unsurprisingly, been met with defensiveness, if not biliousness, by many of the humanities\u2019 leading voices.<\/p>\n

But Ahmed\u2019s warning that philology, under the cover of democratic thought, is actually entrenched with race science and imperialism has been eerily validated and generatively responded to in two monographs: Laura Spinney\u2019s Proto: How One Ancient Language Went Global <\/em>and Jennifer Scappettone\u2019s Poetry After Barbarism: The Invention of Motherless Tongues and Resistance to Fascism<\/em>. Both books mobilize language, and the prospect of translingual communication, as their objects of study, with markedly different political ambitions and veneers.<\/p>\n

Against the background of philology\u2019s constitution, collocation, and shared parentage with the liberal humanities in the aftermath of the 20th century\u2019s genocides and displacements, Spinney\u2019s contribution to the field is less poetry, more science. Proto<\/em>\u2019s scientizing of the core tenets of humanism and universalism, though nobly tuned toward a call for Ukrainian liberation, ultimately, and dangerously, begets a project mired in racial logics.<\/p>\n

These trappings, I suggest, are land mines laid down by the machinery of philology and require sincere intellectual effort to avoid. Such an effort, or spirit of effort, is made manifest in Scappettone\u2019s Poetry After Barbarism<\/em>. By escaping Babel through the configuration of the Pentecost, the history of language can refuse genealogy in favor of solidarity and set aside what we have shared in favor of what we might someday share\u2014if only we let ourselves feel the light of another myth.<\/p>\n\n

\n\n
Related readings<\/div>\n\n
\n\n
\n
\n \"\"<\/a> <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n\n
\n Reviews<\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n Arabic \u2260 Latin: Sacred Language in a Secular Age<\/a>\n <\/h5>\n\n
\n \n Henry Clements <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\u201cOur shared humanity\u201d is an idea to which liberalism\u201a and the liberal academy, often retreats. Liberals employ it as a salve whenever our multiracial, multiethnic civil union is injured: all people, after all, have art, music, and poetry. \u201cAll people,\u201d that is, share the common ancestry of a once united, now accidentally divided people of Babel.<\/p>\n

This liberal tradition understands philology\u2014the study of languages\u2014as principally a historicist study of humanism. And it is best voiced in the theory of Weltliteratur<\/em>, world literature, composed by the magnanimous Erich Auerbach in the aftermath of the Shoah and its epistemicide. Exiled in Istanbul, the German Jewish comparativist renegotiated world literature in his declarative disciplinary study, Mimesis<\/em>, which drew his field\u2019s attention back to its universal dimensions. In his foundational 1952 essay, \u201cPhilology and Weltliteratur<\/em>,\u201d brought into English in 1969 by Maire and Edward Said, Auerbach concludes with a daring mission:<\/p>\n

In any event, our philological home is the earth: it can no longer be the nation. The most priceless and indispensable part of a philologist’s heritage is still his own nation’s culture and language. Only when he is first separated from this heritage, however, and then transcends it does it become truly effective. We must return, in admittedly altered circumstances, to the knowledge that prenational medieval culture already possessed: the knowledge that the spirit [Geist<\/em>] is not national.2<\/a><\/sup><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Auerbach\u2019s antinationalist configuration of philology affixed humanism at the center of the field. This sensibility was redoubled in the 1980s with a decidedly postwar generation that had settled on the academic humanities\u2019, and particularly literary criticism\u2019s, foundational seat in democratic structures. Elegizing his colleague Lionel Trilling and Trilling\u2019s teaching of the Columbia Core Curriculum, Said in the opening essay to Humanism and Democratic Criticism<\/em> reflected, \u201cWhat concerns me is humanism as a useable praxis for intellectuals and academics who want to know what they are doing, what they are committed to as scholars, and who want also to connect these principles to the world in which they live as citizens.\u201d3<\/a><\/sup> Into this milieu, George Steiner, another fugitive of Europe\u2019s antisemitism, thrust his masterpiece, After Babel<\/em>, and his anti-Zionist critique, \u201cOur Homeland, the Text.\u201d Reflecting on the prelapsarian \u201cAdamic circumstance,\u201d when \u201cworld and word were one,\u201d Steiner traces the relationship among the Jewish diaspora, their \u201capocalyptic writ,\u201d and the false prophet nation-state, Israel.4<\/a><\/sup> Refusing the ancient mandates issued by modern political actors, he resolves:<\/p>\n

Locked materially in a material homeland, the text may, in fact, lose its life-force, and its truth values may be betrayed. But when the text is the homeland, even when it is rooted only in the exact remembrance and seeking of a handful of wanderers, nomads of the word, it cannot be extinguished.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Over the decades since World War II, literary criticism warmly embraced methods, texts, and scholarship that careened toward the universal, toward \u201cthe world,\u201d toward rebuilding Babel. And these, in turn, helped the discipline eschew clickbait nationalism in favor of democratic society\u2019s melted pot. The chairs of this field in recent decades\u2014Sheldon Pollock, David Damrosch, Benjamin Elman\u2014pooled their projects from global (or more accurately non-Western) evidentiary wells, with Romance philology serving as comparanda and not primary study, thereby substantiating the worldliness of a world philology.<\/p>\n

And yet, as postcolonial and Black studies critiques demonstrated, they also eschewed the necessary textures of subjectivity, especially the subjectivities of raced, colonized, and classed persons and literatures. \u201cWorld\u201d philology\u2019s normative, standardizing force of comparison itself collapsed and reduced non-Western traditions, rendering recognizably Western forms of literature. Such critiques reject theories of \u201cour languages are one\u201d as a naive and frumpy outfit for the humanist to wear. As Said himself later noted, although Auerbach said that \u201cour philological home is the earth,\u201d \u201chis earthly home is European culture.\u201d5<\/a><\/sup>
\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n

The term “global” is often a tool to smuggle in its own projects of Eurocentric hegemony.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/figure>\n

<\/p>\n

Laura Spinney\u2019s much-buzzed-about Proto: How One Ancient Language Went Global<\/em> steps into an established tradition: employing an originary language (a defined homeland or urheimat<\/em>) in mapping a migration that is \u201ceasily the most important event of the last five millennia, in the Old World.\u201d This proto-language is important to Spinney because of the modern preponderance of its descendant tongues, with Indo-European thus becoming the scaffolding for our globalized world.<\/p>\n

But the term global<\/em> is often a tool to smuggle in its own projects of Eurocentric hegemony. The Global South in Proto<\/em> is but a castaway of a once unified Global North and has lost its own texture, history, autonomy, and genealogy for a data-driven, race-science-gullible audience glad to eat up the sparse, phantasmic records of \u201cmicroscopic traces of food trapped in dental plaque\u201d and \u201cthe remains of dozens of dogs and at least one wolf.\u201d<\/p>\n

Spinney\u2019s predecessors in this universalizing philological project fortified their science of linguistics with abstract models and reconstructions, like \u201claryngeal theory.\u201d Taking a different tack, Spinney, who cut her teeth in science journalism with a book on the Spanish flu, spins a tale of Babel without poetry and instead with DNA testing, archaeobotany, and computational biology. Her reliance on these evidentiary sites is notable from the book\u2019s introduction:<\/p>\n

How do you study a language that has been dead for thousands of years and was never written down? The short answer is with humility. A longer answer is with linguistics, archaeology and genetics. Historical linguistics probes the history that languages carry within themselves; archaeology tracks ideas and knowledge, the ingredients of culture; genetics tracks people. Though there is no one-to-one mapping of language, culture and genes, relationships do exist between these three, meaning that each one can be informative about the other two.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Without irony, Spinney titled this introduction \u201cAriomania,\u201d hinting that she might know what\u2019s so wrong with the idea of the \u201cAryan\u201d\u2014Indo-European Studies\u2019 proof of concept\u2014even while pouring the plaster of evidence into its figural mold. But as Spinney repeats these three terms\u2014linguistics, archaeology, genetics, linguistics, archaeology, genetics<\/em>\u2014they harmonize into a recognizable tune: race science.<\/p>\n

Spinney\u2019s proto-people, conquering and colonizing on horseback, leave data-laden breadcrumbs for us to find, and memorialize. She flags their virtues, these people we do not call Aryans (because that would sound bad!) but instead \u201cthe Yamnaya,\u201d a term given by archaeology, in Russian and Ukrainian, referring to the buried mounds these people left behind: \u201cThe bearers of that culture varied their style of pottery and metalwork, and their diet, but to start with, at least, their treatment of the dead never wavered \u2026 They were extremely homogeneous genetically too, in the beginning.\u201d<\/p>\n

What unifies the Yamnaya is how they treated their dead\u2014oh, and also the traces of their Y-chromosomal evidence scraped off piles of millennia-old bones in the steppe. But Yamnaya<\/em> is no less a politically sharpened term than Aryan<\/em>; it just points to a different cause c\u00e9l\u00e8bre. Documenting her fieldwork, Spinney introduces the terminology of the Yamnaya: \u201cThat summer of 2023, while war raged across the Don and a mercenary named Yevgeny Prigozhin led a rebellion out of Rostov, a few hundred kilometres to the west, I watched Shishlina\u2019s team excavate their umpteenth kurgan.\u201d In such moments Spinney\u2019s work most closely positions itself in the long arc of Indo-European\u2019s entanglement in the liberal democratic project. As the pages go on, the reader, statistically likely to be a grandchild of her Yamnaya, feels their debt to the Ukrainian landscape accumulating, and its descendants take on place as genetic begetters, the chromosomal bearers of our own selves: \u201cIt would be an understatement to say that Russia\u2019s war on Ukraine has had a detrimental effect on research into the Indo-European languages, whose cradle many scholars believe lies between the two countries.\u201d<\/p>\n

What I chafe against here isn\u2019t the humane call to protect and liberate a besieged people. It\u2019s that to generate such sympathy, Spinney constructs an ancient race, linguistically and racially substantiated. The rallying call of our political oneness need not be bound to our literal, genetic oneness, but a practice of solidarity that transcends those very constructs.<\/p>\n\n

\n\n
Related readings<\/div>\n\n
\n\n
\n
\n \"\"<\/a> <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n\n
\n Essays<\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n Finding Nowhere<\/a>\n <\/h5>\n\n
\n \n Stephanie Wong <\/a>, et al.\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

What would such an antigenealogical, transcendent philology that I\u2019ve called for here look like? One example might be found in Jennifer Scappettone\u2019s Poetry After Barbarism: The Invention of Motherless Tongues and Resistance to Fascism<\/em>. Explicitly and abundantly antistatist, Scappettone\u2019s work engages with national language traditions without reinscribing dominant geopolitics. Instead, the book offers a course toward \u201calternative republics \u2026 in which poetry (and its undervalued kith, translation) might assume a central agency,\u201d noting:<\/p>\n

Needless to say, the language of a People conceived as monolith needs to disavow the ineluctably shared histories and futures of speech and writing, which deposit themselves in linguistic resources representing a treasury of exchange impossible to shut down: a perpetual transmutation taking place in the ungovernable work of ears, mouths, and hands absorbing and passing on difference.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Difference, not an anachronistic Eden of similarity, is the indubitable protagonist of Scappettone\u2019s story. Approaching the poetic traditions and artistic practices of fugitives, waywards, and exiles, from Etel Adnan to LaTasha N. Nevada Diggs, Scappettone retells not the story of Babel but the story of the Pentecost: wherein Christ\u2019s followers, inspired by the divine spirit\u2014\u201cinspired\u201d in the literal sense of \u201cbreathed into\u201d\u2014are suddenly able to speak languages foreign to them.<\/p>\n

The Pentecost does not repair Babel but redrafts it, placing an antidote for our separation and noncommunication back in the hands of those who believe and care enough to speak beyond sameness: poets. Guided by the potential of xenoglossy<\/em>\u2014the spontaneous knowledge of an unlearned language\u2014Scappettone\u2019s book gathers near-magical moments of people producing works intelligible to those othered to them. These achievements, Scappettone notes, are not because of a myth of shared descent, but because of the possibility of their shared occupation of a homeland, enacted not through the state but through experience, performance, and poetics.<\/p>\n

Thus, Poetry After Barbarism<\/em> might be an inaugural bid at a philology without Babel. Scappettone\u2019s book embraces Ahmed\u2019s impossible invitation for language study to not repair through shared heritage or reform through shared futurity, but instead to regenerate legibility, refuse the pure, reembrace the gift of the unknown. Our new guiding myth, I take it, must be the Pentecost. We must live not at the moment of our scattering but at the moment of our spontaneous, and earned, remembrance. Importantly, though, Scappettone makes clear her work is not originary but collectivizing: it brings under a shared light generations of language workers before her, including an impressive chapter on the Italian philologist that undrapes a disciplinary tradition of antifascist praxis.<\/p>\n

In this, Scappettone offers the ultimate rejoinder to both Auerbach and Said. To her, it is not enough that our philological home is the earth. In fact, our language\u2014our home\u2014must also be planetary and cosmic, escaping the entrapments that make an internationalized earth just another vestige of the state.<\/p>\n

We need not see ourselves as scattered halves looking to be made whole by a return to a unified state. Escaping Babel\u2019s haunt, it\u2019s possible to see\u2014xenoglossically\u2014our bodies, our histories, our languages as complete in themselves. The task remains, then, to extend care, humanity, solidarity, and life, to tongues\u2014and people\u2014outside of the trajectories inscribed by our protos; to raze the language tree that dictates our cultural debt and our naturalized nations; and to reinvest in living with, and living for, difference.<\/p>\n

  1. Siraj Ahmed, Archaeology of Babel: The Colonial Foundations of the Humanities<\/em> (Stanford University Press, 2017), p. 20. \u21a9<\/a><\/li>
  2. Erich Auerbach, \u201cPhilology and \u2018Weltliteratur,\u2019\u201d translated by Edward and Maire Said, The Centennial Review<\/em>, vol. 13, no. 1 (1969). \u21a9<\/a><\/li>
  3. Edward Said, Humanism and Democratic Criticism<\/em> (Columbia University Press, 2004), p. 6. \u21a9<\/a><\/li>
  4. George Steiner, \u201cOur Homeland, Our Text,\u201d Salmagundi<\/em>, no. 66 (1985), 8. \u21a9<\/a><\/li>
  5. Edward Said, The World, the Text, and the Critic<\/em> (Harvard University Press, 1983), p. 7. \u21a9<\/a><\/li><\/ol><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Allegedly, some 45% of languages descend from one, ancient \u201dProto-Indo-European\u201c tongue. But why focus on a hypothetical lost language, when we can work instead to hear one another today?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":34,"featured_media":61541,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2497],"tags":[1090,1437,132,1322,1087,1461,134,441],"pbpartner":[],"section":[1133],"pbseries":[],"class_list":["post-61528","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-reviews","tag-bloomsbury","tag-classics","tag-colonialism","tag-columbia-university-press","tag-culture","tag-global-south","tag-humanities","tag-language","section-anthropology-religion"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAgainst Babel: Or, How to Talk to Strangers - Public Books<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allegedly, some 45% of languages descend from one, ancient \u201dProto-Indo-European\u201c tongue. But why focus on a hypothetical lost language, when we can work instead to hear one another today?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Against Babel: Or, How to Talk to Strangers - Public Books\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allegedly, some 45% of languages descend from one, ancient \u201dProto-Indo-European\u201c tongue. But why focus on a hypothetical lost language, when we can work instead to hear one another today?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Public Books\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/Public-Books\/201143656634392\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-15T16:00:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-17T02:10:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Sanskrit_written_on_the_Brihadisvara_Temple_Thanjavur-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"960\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"686\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Morgan Barry\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Morgan Barry\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e6018e41f8c5a5598e3158b2e2f5ed3a\"},\"headline\":\"Against Babel: Or, How to Talk to Strangers\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-15T16:00:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-17T02:10:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2839,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Sanskrit_written_on_the_Brihadisvara_Temple_Thanjavur-1.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Bloomsbury\",\"Classics\",\"Colonialism\",\"Columbia University Press\",\"Culture\",\"Global South\",\"Humanities\",\"Language\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Reviews\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\\\/\",\"name\":\"Against Babel: Or, How to Talk to Strangers - Public Books\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Sanskrit_written_on_the_Brihadisvara_Temple_Thanjavur-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-15T16:00:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-17T02:10:01+00:00\",\"description\":\"Allegedly, some 45% of languages descend from one, ancient \u201dProto-Indo-European\u201c tongue. But why focus on a hypothetical lost language, when we can work instead to hear one another today?\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Sanskrit_written_on_the_Brihadisvara_Temple_Thanjavur-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Sanskrit_written_on_the_Brihadisvara_Temple_Thanjavur-1.jpg\",\"width\":960,\"height\":686},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Against Babel: Or, How to Talk to Strangers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"Public Books\",\"description\":\"a magazine of ideas, arts, and scholarship\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Public Books\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/08\\\/pb_logo_2x.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/08\\\/pb_logo_2x.jpg\",\"width\":212,\"height\":362,\"caption\":\"Public Books\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/pages\\\/Public-Books\\\/201143656634392\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/public_books\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e6018e41f8c5a5598e3158b2e2f5ed3a\",\"name\":\"Morgan Barry\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Against Babel: Or, How to Talk to Strangers - Public Books","description":"Allegedly, some 45% of languages descend from one, ancient \u201dProto-Indo-European\u201c tongue. But why focus on a hypothetical lost language, when we can work instead to hear one another today?","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Against Babel: Or, How to Talk to Strangers - Public Books","og_description":"Allegedly, some 45% of languages descend from one, ancient \u201dProto-Indo-European\u201c tongue. But why focus on a hypothetical lost language, when we can work instead to hear one another today?","og_url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\/","og_site_name":"Public Books","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/Public-Books\/201143656634392","article_published_time":"2026-01-15T16:00:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-17T02:10:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":960,"height":686,"url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Sanskrit_written_on_the_Brihadisvara_Temple_Thanjavur-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Morgan Barry","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\/"},"author":{"name":"Morgan Barry","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#\/schema\/person\/e6018e41f8c5a5598e3158b2e2f5ed3a"},"headline":"Against Babel: Or, How to Talk to Strangers","datePublished":"2026-01-15T16:00:43+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-17T02:10:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\/"},"wordCount":2839,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Sanskrit_written_on_the_Brihadisvara_Temple_Thanjavur-1.jpg","keywords":["Bloomsbury","Classics","Colonialism","Columbia University Press","Culture","Global South","Humanities","Language"],"articleSection":["Reviews"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\/","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\/","name":"Against Babel: Or, How to Talk to Strangers - Public Books","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Sanskrit_written_on_the_Brihadisvara_Temple_Thanjavur-1.jpg","datePublished":"2026-01-15T16:00:43+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-17T02:10:01+00:00","description":"Allegedly, some 45% of languages descend from one, ancient \u201dProto-Indo-European\u201c tongue. But why focus on a hypothetical lost language, when we can work instead to hear one another today?","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Sanskrit_written_on_the_Brihadisvara_Temple_Thanjavur-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Sanskrit_written_on_the_Brihadisvara_Temple_Thanjavur-1.jpg","width":960,"height":686},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/against-babel-or-how-to-talk-to-strangers\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Against Babel: Or, How to Talk to Strangers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/","name":"Public Books","description":"a magazine of ideas, arts, and scholarship","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#organization","name":"Public Books","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/pb_logo_2x.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/pb_logo_2x.jpg","width":212,"height":362,"caption":"Public Books"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/Public-Books\/201143656634392","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/public_books\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#\/schema\/person\/e6018e41f8c5a5598e3158b2e2f5ed3a","name":"Morgan Barry"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61528","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/34"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61528"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61528\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":61650,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61528\/revisions\/61650"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/61541"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61528"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61528"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61528"},{"taxonomy":"pbpartner","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pbpartner?post=61528"},{"taxonomy":"section","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/section?post=61528"},{"taxonomy":"pbseries","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pbseries?post=61528"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}