{"id":60440,"date":"2025-08-14T10:00:23","date_gmt":"2025-08-14T15:00:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/?p=60440"},"modified":"2026-01-16T20:10:10","modified_gmt":"2026-01-17T02:10:10","slug":"our-golden-age-of-reading-online","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\/","title":{"rendered":"Our Golden Age of Reading (Online)"},"content":{"rendered":"

The AAPI- and woman-owned Cupid\u2019s Bookshop<\/a>, an independent bookstore located in the vibrant Manayunk neighborhood of Philadelphia, specializes in the romance genre, and it brims with feminine aesthetics, bookish merchandise, new romance novels\u2014and, of course, passionate readers. When I tell people about Cupid\u2019s\u2014either fellow literary scholars or amateur book lovers\u2014I get two responses: absolute astonishment mixed with confusion and dismissal; or, a loving, knowing nod and smile followed by a waterfall of questions about their shelving, displays, and events.<\/p>\n

Astonishment at the success of such genre bookstores often comes from literary scholars, high-brow amateur readers, and other participants in the upper echelons of culture: people who seek out prize-wining, aesthetically sophisticated, gate-kept literature to consume in their leisure, but perhaps not for<\/em> their leisure. Readers, in other words, who think of the latest Sally Rooney as their pleasure reading, and the most romantic kind of story they\u2019re interested in. By contrast, the second response comes from garden variety joyful readers\u2014often women\u2014whose taste leans happy and collective rather than serious and consecrated.<\/p>\n

Explaining this second group to the first is the great achievement of University of Groningen (Netherlands) professor Federico Pianzola\u2019s new book Digital Social Reading: Sharing Fiction in the Twenty-First Century<\/em>, especially since it does so without simplifying, romanticizing, or dismissing either group\u2019s sense of what literature is, can be, and should do. As more than just a hope but as an actual research finding, Pianzola suggests that despite fears of very short attention spans and echo chambers, the reading of fiction\u2014broadly and inclusively understood\u2014might actually be experiencing a golden age through social media.<\/p>\n

The readers Pianzola is most concerned with are not just feminized fans of romance, but also readers of popular fiction and especially Gen Z. These literatures and reading cultures, as the title Digital Social Reading <\/em>suggests, are mostly found on the internet. Still, Pianzola does note that brick-and-mortar bookstores tie into his larger argument. A bookstore that one visits in person could feel like a step back, at least, in contrast to the virtually unlimited availability of books on the internet. However, this is not necessarily true, as Pianzola argues:<\/p>\n

[in] brick-and-mortar bookshops and libraries, the availability and disposition of books are not planned based on the needs of individual readers\u2014advertising can be targeted at users only in more generic ways [as opposed to algorithmic recommendation culture online]\u2014thus \u201ctruly\u201d serendipitous encounters with books are still possible. And the mere fact of visiting such physical places, knowing how to look for information and stories we may like, positions us as active agents within the cultural field. The more we are active explorers of the aisles and shelves of a bookshop or library, the better the chances of finding books that are meaningful for us.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

As he does bookstore visits\u2014and the \u201cinstagrammability\u201d of romance bookstores in particular seems to further prove his point\u2014Pianzola takes seriously young people\u2019s love of literature, their participation in literary debates, and the online platforms they use for both practices. Instead of harshly judging digital social reading practices, Pianzola takes young readers and their practices online seriously as cultural, cognitive, and collective behaviors that are central to contemporary literature.<\/p>\n

There is an urgent need for new, more affirmative ways to participate in culture, especially against the ongoing systematic whiteness of publishing and the exclusivity of elite institutions. As such, it is indeed imperative to focus\u00a0on readers online as \u201cDigital platforms offer a variety of stories that readers struggle to find in the catalogs of the traditional publishing industry \u2026 stories that represent ethnic minorities and queer characters in prominent roles.\u201d In a way, Pianzola echoes a recent trend of contemporary fiction about the limitations of the publishing industry, its ongoing structural racism, the feminization of its underpaid labor force, and so on. This trend has been written about by scholars such as Sarah Brouillette and embodied by novels such as Zakiya Dalila Harris\u2019s The Other Black Girl <\/em>(2021), R. F. Kuang\u2019s Yellowface <\/em>(2023), and, in its by far most mellow iteration, Emily Henry\u2019s novel, Book Lovers<\/em> (2022). These novels are situated on the borders of literary fiction, horror, romance, and chick lit. And they sit there for a reason: the wider the reach of genre, the easier to encompass a wide range of emotion, plot, experience, and, perhaps most importantly, audience.<\/p>\n

While much of the evidence and argument in Digital Social Reading <\/em>delivers a surprising jolt of optimism, what stayed with me the most was, simply, the fact of an academic argument about joy and reading. Pianzola is not primarily concerned with short attention spans, rich white women still dominating the landscaped of well-known heroines in popular fiction, or young people\u2019s turn away from long-form narrative. He is aware of such problems, as are the novels I mentioned, and of course does not dismiss them. But, for most of the book, he quite simply finds more interesting things to talk about.<\/p>\n

The aspect of the book I found most compelling, personally, is Pianzola\u2019s staunch insistence that as a scholar one can hold a primary interest in \u201cfictional narratives \u2026<\/em> [and] enjoyment.\u201d This is important, because it is a kind of reading different from scholarly or educational reading. Moreover, it reframes what uses readers put literature to: \u201cit is worth focusing on how affect arises because this is often the end sought by readers, who are not that much interested in literary value.\u201d Importantly, affect does not foreclose value.<\/p>\n

Thus, Digital Social Reading <\/em>serves as a timely defense (and instruction manual for the academic study) of joyfully reading fiction in one\u2019s free time: \u201cmore than worrying about saving literature,\u201d Pianzola writes, \u201cI think it is important to grant people the right to be saved by the stories they need.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

\n\n
Related readings<\/div>\n\n
\n\n
\n
\n \"\"<\/a> <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n\n
\n Reviews<\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n Physical Books, Digital Lives<\/a>\n <\/h5>\n\n
\n \n \"\" <\/a>\n \n Tess McNulty <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

Reading has become digital and social. Both of these new phenomena might lead to dismissal on grounds of triviality, groupthink, data-harvesting, and related (and very valid) concerns. But the facts of this contemporary moment of literary culture\u2014which the book names as Digital Social Reading (DSR)\u2014only raises the stakes of Pianzola\u2019s project, because \u201creading today is a phenomenon related to a variety of media, activities, and places. In such a diverse context, it is crucial to understand how to study reading practices in their increasing complexity.\u201d This is why Pianzola investigates so many different kinds of readers\u2014young people who read fiction, amateur readers who conceptualize genre and other systems of categorization, and devoted fans who write their own stories\u2014to understand our most recent technological and sociological iteration of bookish cultural life.<\/p>\n

Thinking about leisure reading, Pianzola provides \u201ccomprehension not only of the digital literary sphere but also of the cognitive and aesthetic aspects of reading.\u201d Pianzola compellingly argues that \u201cevery reading act is valuable and contributes to the personal growth of the reader, with respect to both literacy and cognitive-emotional skills \u2026 judgments of superficiality [of certain reading practices] are often the outcome of a superficial analysis (or a refusal to do any analysis at all).\u201d Pianzola\u2019s own contributions are significant and abundant. Moreover, his extremely valuable literature review across various countries, platforms, and kinds of DSR is a useful tool for researchers and those curious to learn about reading today. Like the internet, furthermore, his research and career are fairly global.<\/p>\n

Available as a printed book and as open access on the internet, Digital Social Reading: Sharing Fiction in the Twenty-First Century\u00a0<\/em>will shape the field of reader studies and shift our understanding of both the remit and stakes of literary studies. Pianzola offers the transformative axiom that \u201cStudying digital social reading is a way to make literary and reading studies more democratic by focusing on the margins.\u201d He specifies, \u201cStories help people manage anxiety, fear, and uncertainty, and they help with identity and self-esteem. \u2026 social inequality [to paraphrase Safiya Umoja Noble] will not be solved by digital social reading, but there are many silver linings that can have a positive impact on the lives of many young readers.\u201d<\/p>\n

Pianzola is among the first scholars who take seriously what people do with books on the internet, about a decade into the regimes of some of the most widely used social media apps and platforms for readers. He thus continues a line of research started by Australian literary scholar Simone Murray and others, but that remains underexplored. This absence is due to methodological challenges that can only be tackled with a multidisciplinary, multilingual, and collaborative approach.<\/p>\n

The book, first, offers a major contribution to fields such as reader studies, contemporary literature, and digital humanities because of its methodological agenda and extensive, international, and intersectional literature review. Naming and critically considering a wide range of theoretical and empirical work, the book makes much valuable evidence and information available to researchers who are either new to the field or located squarely in a particular disciplinary or geographical location. Second, Digital Social Reading <\/em>offers case studies on annotation, marginalia, fan fiction, amateur reviews and taxonomies on platforms such as Archive of Our Own (AO3), Goodreads, and Wattpad. Establishing robust working understandings of digital and social reading, Pianzola acknowledges critiques as far back as Plato\u2019s Phaedrus<\/em>; still, he defends new technologies as too complex for straightforward dismissal.<\/p>\n

Specifically, the focus on young readers as participants in culture<\/em> (rather than in education or literacy) is a primary contribution of this scholarship. Given their strong generational bias toward digital social activity, Generation Z makes for the required case study, and Pianzola\u2019s analysis of this generation serves as a model of how to do profound research: \u201cAs a scholar interested in how stories are meaningful for people and have an impact on their lives, I take this kind of claim [by a young person about Wattpad] as an invitation to challenge the assumptions I have about what reading means. I am eager to know better what kind of stories these young authors are creating, how they are received by their peers, and how these writing and reading dynamics change over time.\u201d Curious and non-judgmental, Pianzola studies the generation that not only most intensely pursues the type of cultural and media activity, but, also, seems to be particularly apt at it.<\/p>\n

This sustained focus on young people is only one way of several in which Pianzola thinks about the reception of literature from beyond the center of power and gatekeeping: \u201cDSR spaces (e.g., online book clubs and fandoms) and practices (e.g., beta reading drafts by amateur writers and writing book reviews) are often created as a way to participate in cultural discussions otherwise dominated by a small group of readers, namely individuals belonging to the publishing and media industries and to educational institutions.\u201d<\/p>\n

Insightful, critical, and at a small generational remove from his teenage and young adult subjects, Pianzola carefully balances analysis and questions with earnestness. He takes reading cultures online at face value. And this, in turn, enables\u2014we might even say is the foundation of\u2014a profound understanding of their workings, and then a thoughtful, comprehensive, and generative critique.<\/p>\n\n

\n\n
Related readings<\/div>\n\n
\n\n
\n
\n \"\"<\/a> <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n\n
\n Essays<\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n What Counts as a Bestseller?<\/a>\n <\/h5>\n\n
\n \n \"\" <\/a>\n \n Jordan Pruett <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

Thus, Digital Social Reading<\/em> goes beyond the so-called benefits of reading, in the style of neo-liberal self-improvement. Instead, Pianzola advocates a profound human insistence on the need for stories, because they help us make sense of ourselves and one another, and further support the building of community because \u201cwhen they find the books they want, readers also like to connect with others who are similar to them or who simply share their same passion.\u201d<\/p>\n

This is where the enjoyment of reading becomes deeply meaningful. Making more people passionate readers\u2014with and against educational institutions, which can both amplify and scare away bookishness\u2014is a primary asset of DSR. Now is the time for this kind of inquiry, Pianzola argues, because, \u201cfor the first time in history, we have access to the response of millions of readers, an opportunity that can open new ways of understanding how readers choose what books to read and how they engage with them.\u201d1<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Pianzola offers a historical overview of how books have existed in the world, from before the Gutenberg parenthesis, the time of the printing press as the dominant technology of text, to today\u2019s \u201chyperparatextuality.\u201d Rather than figuring the compound of digital and\/or social as a distraction from a profound reading experience, Pianzola proposes that DSR \u201ccontexts add an extra layer of social and media complexity to the complexity of the reading act. That is why a broader range of literacy, social, cognitive, and emotional skills are needed and activated when sharing reading experiences with others.\u201d Perhaps, then, DSR is not just a fun, but, also, particularly sophisticated modality of engaging with and experiencing text.<\/p>\n

The fact that social reading goes beyond the individual requires an astute consideration of digital community, because \u201cinteractions and bonds between individuals meeting via digital media can occur in different ways.\u201d Pianzola provides an interdisciplinary overview of alternate terms including the particularly suggestive \u201caffinity space\u201d and \u201cambient affiliation.\u201d These terms are useful because they put \u201ca different emphasis on individual agency, on the reason for which people interact, and on the strength of the ties between them. The widest consensus with respect to DSR seems to be around the concept of \u2018affinity,\u2019 which allows us to keep the focus on the book as a mediator of social relationships [\u2026] a principle of affinity<\/em>, rather than geographical, educational, or demographic traits.\u201d As ever, this is not a wholesale endorsement of all bookish interactions online, since \u201cit would be naive to think that passion and a few common interests alone can bring about something as complex as a lively community.\u201d
\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Fan fiction\u2014in its very concept and structure\u2014offers a turn to the margins that makes diversity possible.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/figure>\n

<\/p>\n

The book turns to annotation and marginalia as places where community emerge. This is an important move, on the level of content as well as method, given that \u201cstudying digital social reading is a way to make literary and reading studies more democratic by focusing on the margins, whether that is the material margins of the text or the marginalized individuals who find their voice and audience through online publishing, reading, and discussing.\u201d Focusing on marginalia, Pianzola considers the social reading platform Wattpad and its opportunities for \u201cstory co-construction,\u201d through \u201ccomments in the margins [that] offer an insight into the process of identity negotiation, reading comprehension, and the emergence\/development of emotions and thoughts regarding a story.\u201d This, in turn, leads Pianzola to find a \u201ccollective intelligence\u201d in the margins.<\/p>\n

Presenting data such as is available on Wattpad users, Pianzola confirms that this site is the<\/em> place to think about contemporary young adult literature, especially when trying to understand its global dimensions: \u201cWattpad demonstrates that in the twenty-first century, thanks to digital technology, diversity in readers\u2019 response can be found simultaneously on the same reading platform.\u201d Dispelling the idea that digital reading necessarily does away with the materiality of books, he offers the fun fact, gleamed from a survey, that many Wattpad users buy up to two paperback books per month.<\/p>\n

Pianzola offers an example of how one can track affect and aesthetic judgment through Wattpad annotation with the Jane Austen novel Pride and Prejudice<\/em>, which is available on Wattpad\u2014and highly popular in part because of a reference in the Harry Styles fan fiction After.<\/em> He finds that it is \u201cpossible to identify patterns related to narrative interest, aesthetic values, and social interaction. When reading teen fiction, social bonding (affective interaction) is prevalent, and when reading classics social-cognitive interaction (collective intelligence) is prevalent.\u201d In other words, Wattpad readers not only read Jane Austen, but they help one another to read her novels well.<\/p>\n

Turning to another highly relevant platform, Pianzola thinks about the crucial literary site of fanfiction: AO3. The only non-commercial readership platform under consideration here, AO3 is \u201can emblematic manifestation of creative and critical reading.\u201d<\/p>\n

The gift economy of fan fiction, of course, is famous for male male romance, since the early days of the first Star Trek<\/em> series and the characters of Kirk and Spock inspiring queer fan fiction. More generally, fan fiction\u2014in its very concept and structure\u2014offers a turn to the margins that makes diversity possible. This is crucial, especially because the representation available in mainstream and commercial publishing is so very narrow. In this, fanfiction can interfere in two primary modes: \u201cone related to the underspecification of a character\u2019s personality and life story, which leave more room for the fans\u2019 imaginary explorations, and one related to the underrepresentation of racial, ethnic, and gender identities in prominent roles in mainstream literature, which leads fans to self-identify with such minor characters and to be willing to tell their stories.\u201d Significantly, Pianzola finds that the sheer abundance of available stories is a big part of what makes fanfic more diverse. Overall, \u201cthanks to their diversity of cultures and topics, Wattpad and fanfiction platforms seem to be places where people can find \u2018intimate serendipity, a place where they can express an authentic sense of self without fear or attack, manipulation, or unusual exposure while remaining open to things that will surprise and delight them\u2019 (Reagle 2015).\u201d<\/p>\n

While AO3 and Wattpad use tagging in fairly idiosyncratic ways with a focus on identification and trigger warnings as much as literary classification, the shelves on Goodreads are more similar to what literary scholars understand as literary genre: \u201cGenre is the concept around which the majority of DSR practices are organized, and reviews on platforms like Goodreads show how distinctions between genres shape readers\u2019 discussions.\u201d<\/p>\n

Thus, literary genre emerges as a point of connection and a site of affect, rather than a signifier of content or aesthetic horizon of expectation. Shelving, then, becomes a marker of what makes a book worth remembering. In terms of genre and reviews, Pianzola comes up against an \u201capparent unavoidability of the power relations of social distinction described by Pierre Bourdieu (1984) and John Guillory (1993) \u2026 amateur book culture still seems to be ruled by the influence of institutional authorities \u2026 not necessarily because these authority opinions are regarded as correct but because they are seen as opinions that matter.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

Overall, a different kind of DSR practice emerges on Goodreads: \u201cBy using Wattpad, people grow more as readers; by using Goodreads, they develop more in their competence to critically appraise what they read.\u201d Citing Rita Felski\u2019s insight on scholarly mood that \u201ccritical detachment, in this light, is not an absence of mood, but one manifestation of it,\u201d Pianzola proposes that Goodreads \u201chas evolved into a very efficient and informative system, with allowances to discuss evaluation and emotional response together with genre-specific conventions.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

\n\n
Related readings<\/div>\n\n
\n\n
\n
\n \"\"<\/a> <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n\n
\n Essays<\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n Genre Juggernaut: Measuring \u201cRomance\u201d<\/a>\n <\/h5>\n\n
\n \n J. D. Porter <\/a>, et al.\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

Foregrounding the stakes of his analysis, Pianzola reviews concerns such as platform capitalism and impaired cognitive processing as primary concerns\u2014before turning to hope. He reasons that \u201cif reading fiction is a way to build social and emotional skills that are needed when interacting with others or facing intense emotions [\u2026], then digital social reading is a way to integrate a practical exercise into reading.\u201d<\/p>\n

Pianzola concludes that \u201cdigital social reading helps to make books more easily approachable cultural objects for many people, dimming their sometimes formidable auras and introducing them into daily routines and familiar activities, like the use of social media.\u201d Given everything we are up against, what more joyful yet profoundly argued conclusion could a scholar offer?<\/p>\n

  1. Pianzola helpfully clarifies that \u201cDigital media have condensed in time and space a sociability that has long been part of reading, as literary systems have always existed and evolved through the interactions of authors, readers, publishers, booksellers, librarians, schools, and so on.\u201d Further defining his topic, Pianzola explains that \u201cThe adjective \u2018digital\u2019 in \u2018digital social reading\u2019 refers to the medium used to talk about books and reading experiences.\u201dAnd by readers, he means human beings who read stories as part of their every life: \u201cHere, I will focus on reading as a cognitive-affective embodied activity, not on readers at large as agents within social, cultural, and pedagogical institutions. I will focus on what people feel and think about the stories they read.\u201d This clarification is important also because it veers away from reading as an isolated activity, which can limit literature\u2019s ability for social change and the creation of a just and equitable world: \u201cin the passage from social reading to digital<\/em> social reading, the agency of cultural distinction became less individual and more shared, or compromised.\u201d In other words, part of the joy here is that we are allowed to say more and choose more, no matter how important, or not, an actor in the field of literature we might be considered to be. \u21a9<\/a><\/li><\/ol><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    There is an urgent need for new, more affirmative ways to participate in culture, especially against the ongoing systematic whiteness of publishing and the exclusivity of elite institutions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":60455,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2497],"tags":[2342,2338,17,930,68,20,1200,203,50],"pbpartner":[],"section":[2341],"pbseries":[],"class_list":["post-60440","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-reviews","tag-culture-industries","tag-digital-culture","tag-fiction","tag-generation-z","tag-internet","tag-literature","tag-mit-press","tag-publishing","tag-social-media","section-culture-industries"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nOur Golden Age of Reading (Online) - Public Books<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"There is an urgent need for new, more affirmative ways to participate in culture, especially against the ongoing systematic whiteness of publishing and the exclusivity of elite institutions.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Our Golden Age of Reading (Online) - Public Books\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"There is an urgent need for new, more affirmative ways to participate in culture, especially against the ongoing systematic whiteness of publishing and the exclusivity of elite institutions.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Public Books\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/Public-Books\/201143656634392\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-08-14T15:00:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-17T02:10:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/bogdan-ses-vbROXPjuy0g-unsplash-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2025\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Eli Baum\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Eli Baum\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c29472797645498f58c1a0c4686540f2\"},\"headline\":\"Our Golden Age of Reading (Online)\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-14T15:00:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-17T02:10:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":3467,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/bogdan-ses-vbROXPjuy0g-unsplash-scaled.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Culture Industries\",\"Digital Culture\",\"Fiction\",\"Generation Z\",\"Internet\",\"Literature\",\"MIT Press\",\"Publishing\",\"Social Media\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Reviews\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\\\/\",\"name\":\"Our Golden Age of Reading (Online) - Public Books\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/bogdan-ses-vbROXPjuy0g-unsplash-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-14T15:00:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-17T02:10:10+00:00\",\"description\":\"There is an urgent need for new, more affirmative ways to participate in culture, especially against the ongoing systematic whiteness of publishing and the exclusivity of elite institutions.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/bogdan-ses-vbROXPjuy0g-unsplash-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/bogdan-ses-vbROXPjuy0g-unsplash-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":2025},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Our Golden Age of Reading (Online)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"Public Books\",\"description\":\"a magazine of ideas, arts, and scholarship\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Public Books\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/08\\\/pb_logo_2x.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/08\\\/pb_logo_2x.jpg\",\"width\":212,\"height\":362,\"caption\":\"Public Books\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/pages\\\/Public-Books\\\/201143656634392\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/public_books\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c29472797645498f58c1a0c4686540f2\",\"name\":\"Eli Baum\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Our Golden Age of Reading (Online) - Public Books","description":"There is an urgent need for new, more affirmative ways to participate in culture, especially against the ongoing systematic whiteness of publishing and the exclusivity of elite institutions.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Our Golden Age of Reading (Online) - Public Books","og_description":"There is an urgent need for new, more affirmative ways to participate in culture, especially against the ongoing systematic whiteness of publishing and the exclusivity of elite institutions.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\/","og_site_name":"Public Books","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/Public-Books\/201143656634392","article_published_time":"2025-08-14T15:00:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-17T02:10:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":2025,"url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/bogdan-ses-vbROXPjuy0g-unsplash-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Eli Baum","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\/"},"author":{"name":"Eli Baum","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#\/schema\/person\/c29472797645498f58c1a0c4686540f2"},"headline":"Our Golden Age of Reading (Online)","datePublished":"2025-08-14T15:00:23+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-17T02:10:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\/"},"wordCount":3467,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/bogdan-ses-vbROXPjuy0g-unsplash-scaled.jpg","keywords":["Culture Industries","Digital Culture","Fiction","Generation Z","Internet","Literature","MIT Press","Publishing","Social Media"],"articleSection":["Reviews"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\/","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\/","name":"Our Golden Age of Reading (Online) - Public Books","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/bogdan-ses-vbROXPjuy0g-unsplash-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2025-08-14T15:00:23+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-17T02:10:10+00:00","description":"There is an urgent need for new, more affirmative ways to participate in culture, especially against the ongoing systematic whiteness of publishing and the exclusivity of elite institutions.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/bogdan-ses-vbROXPjuy0g-unsplash-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/bogdan-ses-vbROXPjuy0g-unsplash-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":2025},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/our-golden-age-of-reading-online\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Our Golden Age of Reading (Online)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/","name":"Public Books","description":"a magazine of ideas, arts, and scholarship","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#organization","name":"Public Books","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/pb_logo_2x.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/pb_logo_2x.jpg","width":212,"height":362,"caption":"Public Books"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/Public-Books\/201143656634392","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/public_books\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#\/schema\/person\/c29472797645498f58c1a0c4686540f2","name":"Eli Baum"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60440","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60440"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60440\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":61707,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60440\/revisions\/61707"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/60455"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60440"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60440"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60440"},{"taxonomy":"pbpartner","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pbpartner?post=60440"},{"taxonomy":"section","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/section?post=60440"},{"taxonomy":"pbseries","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pbseries?post=60440"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}