{"id":59703,"date":"2025-05-21T10:00:52","date_gmt":"2025-05-21T15:00:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/?p=59703"},"modified":"2026-03-23T11:38:07","modified_gmt":"2026-03-23T16:38:07","slug":"lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cLying in Politics\u201d: Hannah Arendt\u2019s Antidote to Anticipatory Despair"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n

Lies can serve a number of functions. People lie to deflect, to avoid embarrassment or evade punishment by creating doubt \u2026 [and they] hope that the lie will be convincing. \u2026 These lies can be annoying or amusing, but they are surmountable. They collapse in the face of facts. \u2026 The Trumpian lie is different. It is the power lie, or the bully lie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014M. Gessen, Surviving Autocracy<\/em> (2020)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

I love M. Gessen\u2019s idea that Trump\u2019s is \u201cthe lie of the bigger kid who took your hat and is wearing it\u2014while denying that he took it. There is no defense against this lie because the point of the lie is to assert power.\u201d Gessen\u2019s taxonomy of lies is a useful guide to the way an aspirational Mussolini strives to replace reality with increasingly outlandish claims that subjects are forced to accept despite their evident falsity. Getting citizens to show their abjection by accepting as false what\u2019s manifestly true is the point of the exercise. The invocation of the Alien Enemies Act, the deportations in direct defiance of judicial orders, and the concomitant lies about those deportations, are examples from March 2025; by the time you read this, another conglomeration of such lies will have taken its turn monopolizing the news.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Whether \u201cpower lie\u201d is the best catch-all for appraising the early days of the Trump administration, however, or even the administration\u2019s most dangerous form of deception, matters a great deal. Nothing is more valuable than a clear-headed understanding of which particular lies are most likely to succeed in the present environment, and which are just evanescent byproducts of the generally mendacious atmosphere. Dodge the decoys, save the right kind of energy to counter the real blows. Turning up the heat in lamenting the current crisis risks mistaking a mere mirage for a more substantial threat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In looking for parallels between the Nazism and Soviet communism of mid-20th-century Europe and 2020s America, many recent writers, including Gessen, have sought inspiration in Hannah Arendt\u2019s magisterial Origins of Totalitarianism<\/em> (1951). In the spirit of Public Book\u2019s \u201cB-Sides\u201d<\/a> series (shining a light on works mistakenly kicked to the curb of history), I\u2019d love to make the case for a different Arendt work: \u201cLying in Politics: Reflections on the Pentagon Papers\u201d (1971). Arendt\u2019s account of what went wrong with US foreign policy in the Vietnam era is germane today for what it reveals about the ultimately brittle nature of autocratic power structures. By her telling, those who want to lead a democratic country over the brink into authoritarian tactics begin by intending to deceive others, succumb to self-deception, and fall eventually into the atmosphere of \u201cdefactualization.\u201d Trump\u2019s \u201cpower lie\u201d is only a single item in the Trumpian food pyramid of lies, bluster, bullshit, and bluff. If we are ready to start disassembling it, Gessen is not enough: Arendt is the guide we need.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Defactualization<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

\u201cLying in Politics<\/a>\u201d is dense with American detail, and it captures aspects of Trump\u2019s present machinations that we ignore at our peril. The piece is framed as a review of the collected Pentagon Papers, which document the messy inner workings of US policy in Vietnam from 1945 to 1968. Arendt links the deceptive practices initiated under Johnson and Kennedy to what follows under Nixon. The downward trajectory for democratic practice is clear: She sees a damaging sequence whereby those in government practiced \u201cdeception, self-deception, image making, ideologizing, and defactualization.\u201d Inch by inch, she sees America moving forward toward that all-pervasive condition of truthlessness that in 1978 Vaclav Havel described as \u201cliving a lie.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Arendt\u2019s essay starts with lying\u2019s omnipresence. Because humans have always been able \u201cto deny in thought and word whatever happens to be the actual fact \u2026 the whole texture of facts \u2026 is always in danger of being perforated by single lies or torn to shreds by the organized lying of groups, nations, or classes, or denied and distorted, often carefully covered up by reams of falsehoods.\u201d It is pointless\u2014and a marker of the Hegelian idealism she frequently criticizes\u2014to hope for some purely theoretical account of the world that settles what\u2019s the case in advance: There is no escaping the hard work of judgment, of aligning generals with particulars. \u201cFacts need testimony to be remembered and trustworthy witnesses to be established in order to find a secure dwelling place in the domain of human affairs.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That means there is always the chance of being duped by someone who deliberately misreports the world. Lying can\u2014and does\u2014happen everywhere. However, the impulse to dupe substantially increases inside a bureaucratic state, with its layers of self-interested deception and self-deception; the modern analogy would be to a media ecosystem, a hall of mirrors where facts vanish in a haze of linked posts, articles, Facebook pages. Reading official statements about Vietnam in The Pentagon Papers<\/em>, Arendt feels her own sense of reality slipping away: \u201cThe quicksand of lying statements of all sorts, deceptions as well as self-deceptions, is apt to engulf any reader.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Arendt makes a shrewd point about how such oxygen-poor environments can develop: \u201cDefactualization and [abstract, unreal] problem solving [rather than recognition of facts] were welcomed [within the Pentagon] because disregard of reality was inherent in the policies and goals themselves.\u201d The US government, striving to justify Vietnam, began by believing their own most optimistic projections of what might <\/em>or what should <\/em>happen (rather than what did), and ended by duping the American people. Once they lost track of the facts, peddling a faked version of reality came naturally to them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The deceivers started with self-deception. Probably because of their high station and their astounding self-assurance, they were so convinced of overwhelming success, not on the battlefield but on the grounds of public relations, and so certain of the soundness of their psychological premises about the unlimited possibilities in manipulating people, that they anticipated<\/em> general belief and victory in the battle for people\u2019s minds. And since they lived anyhow in a defactualized world, they did not find it difficult to pay no more attention to the fact that their audience refused to be convinced than to other facts.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

As Anita Loos said of Mary Pickford, they started believing their own press clippings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Four months in, the new Trump administration is already moving from self-deception and deception on to \u201cimage making\u201d and \u201cideologizing\u201d; it is fast approaching complete \u201cdefactualization.\u201d Examples proliferate. On March 18, for example, a New York Times<\/em> article describes a Trump \u201cfinding\u201d that certain Venezuelans are members of a criminal gang (not proven, merely asserted) and that the gang \u201cis\u201d terrorist (also not proven) and hence creating \u201cwartime\u201d (neither proven nor even officially declared) conditions. When pressed to supply evidence of the underlying facts, \u201cthe Justice Department filing to the appeals court cited Mr. Trump\u2019s \u2018findings\u2019 as the facts by which courts should evaluate the issue<\/a>.\u201d Defactualization at work: like the declaration that Zelensky is a dictator who went to war with Russia, the banning of the AP from White House press briefings over the \u201cGulf of America\u201d or President Trump proclaiming to Governor Mills (when she assured him that Maine would \u201cfollow state and federal laws\u201d) that \u201cwe are the federal law<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n
Related readings<\/div>\n\n
\n\n
\n
\n \"\"<\/a> <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n\n
\n Reviews<\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n The Right to Have Rights<\/a>\n <\/h5>\n\n
\n \n Stephanie DeGooyer <\/a>, et al.\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n\n\n\n

It is noteworthy, though, that these are still attempted<\/em> defactualizations: The court did not accept Trump\u2019s \u201cfindings\u201d in lieu of evidence, Chief Justice Roberts criticized Trump for calling for the judge\u2019s impeachment, Maine\u2019s laws still stand. Arendt\u2019s long view leads her to argue that defactualization of this sort is ultimately doomed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The liar is defeated by reality, for which there is no substitute; no matter how large the tissue of falsehood that an experienced liar has to offer, it will never be large enough, even if he enlists the help of computers, to cover the immensity of factuality. The liar, who may get away with any number of single falsehoods, will find it impossible to get away with lying on principle. \u2026 There always comes the point beyond which lying becomes counterproductive. This point is reached when the audience to which the lies are addressed is forced to disregard altogether the distinguishing line between truth and falsehood in order to be able to survive.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Defactualization met reality in Trump\u2019s first administration repeatedly: Think of COVID. Similar tests will arrive in the next four years. The good news, at least for the long term, is that a factless atmosphere is as corroded (rusted, rickety, and unreliable) as it is corrosive. Arendt offers a persuasive case for why self-deceived liars like Nixon can turn out to be their own worst enemies, whipping up an unsustainable cloudy realm of lies that eventually tumbles down to the old hard factual ground of reality. There will be collateral damage along the way, but the harder we all work to restore a sense of reality in the face of lies and self-deception, the sooner the rebuilding can start.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump is worse intentioned than Nixon, and more successful at overwhelming our system of safeguards against tyranny. Like Nixon in 1971, though, he is just beginning to work his dark designs. That makes it significantly easier to mobilize against them, provided we recognize them for what they are. Our practical political challenge, like that faced by Democrats in the early 1970s, is to emerge into reality again with a road map to steer us toward clearings rather than into subsequent dust storms. The move to declare that we are already deeply enmired in an autocracy is much less useful than what Arendt provides: a diagnosis of how defactualization can rise and an account of its innate instability that points out the virtues of keeping a firm eye on reality and steadily working to deny the lie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Power Bluff<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Arendt\u2019s account of lying in the era of incipient defactualization strikes me as very much in harmony with the various kinds of deceit Harry G. Frankfurt identified in his memorable 1986 essay, \u201cOn Bullshit.\u201d<\/a> It is not enough to divide statements into truths and lies: We need room for the third category of bullshit. Rather than being intended simply to deceive like a lie, bs aims to persuade without regard or even reference to truth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Frankfurt\u2019s taxonomy of bs starts with an unforgettable anecdote. Ludwig Wittgenstein is told by a convalescing friend, \u201cI feel just like a dog that has been run over.\u201d He replies in disgust, \u201cYou don\u2019t know what a dog that has been run over feels like.\u201d<\/a> Wittgenstein certainly sounds like a jerk (not for the first time), but Frankfurt is sympathetic to his frustration; his friend<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

cannot be regarded as lying; for she does not presume that she knows the truth, and therefore she cannot be deliberately promulgating a proposition that she presumes to be false: Her statement is grounded neither in a belief that it is true nor, as a lie must be, in a belief that it is not true. It is just this lack of connection to a concern with truth\u2014this indifference to how things really are\u2014that I regard as of the essence of bullshit \u2026 Her fault is not that she fails to get things right, but that she is not even trying.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The key is that bs is not concerned with truth or falsity at all, only with persuading the audience; it is a statement designed to win a particular speech situation. That intent, Frankfurt goes on to argue, aligns it with a particular type of deliberate lie:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Bluffing too is typically devoted to conveying something false. Unlike plain lying, however, it is more especially a matter not of falsity but of fakery. This is what accounts for its nearness to bullshit. For the essence of bullshit is not that it is false<\/em> but that it is phony<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Hard not to think of the flimsiness of bs when considering the executive order attempting to undo birthright citizenship or the baseless \u201cfindings\u201d (might they be based on misinterpreted tattoos?) about the Venezuelans the Trump administration wants to deport.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gessen\u2019s account of the power lie emphasizes the way Trump\u2019s blatant falsehoods demand fealty. Following Arendt\u2019s account of the way that deception and self-deception lead to an atmosphere of defactualization, though, we also ought to stress the bluff and the phoniness around Trump\u2019s usual bs. Just look at the flimsiness of most of the executive orders, their unseaworthiness when tested: Those deported Venezuelans may not belong to a gang, with whom we are not actually at war, a war which does not in fact exist. Like the thousands of spurious\u2014and it is worth recalling, ultimately unsuccessful\u2014lawsuits in 2020 designed to overthrow or undermine the presidential election, these orders and Justice Department moves are closer to a bluff, or its cousin, bluster, than they are to power lies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Living the Lie<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

What good exactly is this Arendtian account, bolstered by Frankfurt, of Trump as a bluffer who utters his truth-detached statements in a thickening nimbus of deception and self-deception? To go beyond the \u201cpower lie\u201d to find a comprehensive account of what Trump is presently up to, it helps to reconsider the timeline of authoritarianism Vaclav Havel offers in his 1978 essay, \u201cThe Power of the Powerless.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Havel defines the situation that Czechs (not just \u201cdissidents\u201d but all ordinary Czechs) find themselves in: a longstanding and geographically gigantic zone of crushing unreality: \u201cNot only is the dictatorship everywhere based on the same principles and structured in the same way (that is, in the way evolved by the ruling super power), but each country has been completely penetrated by a network of manipulatory instruments controlled by the superpower center and totally subordinated to its interests. \u2026 It offers a ready answer to any question whatsoever; it can scarcely be accepted only in part, and accepting it has profound implications for human life.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His best-known illustration of \u201cliving a lie\u201d involves asking what it means to hang a sign upholding Soviet values in your shop window. It is, he says, a way of bending the knee to the manifold and omnipresent surveillance and control:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The manager of a fruit-and-vegetable shop places in his window, among the onions and carrots, the slogan: \u201cWorkers of the world, unite!\u201d Why does he do it? \u2026 that is the way it has to be. If he were to refuse, there could be trouble. He could be reproached for not having the proper decoration in his window; someone might even accuse him of disloyalty. \u2026 It is one of the thousands of details that guarantee him a relatively tranquil life \u201cin harmony with society,\u201d as they say. \u2026 The slogan is really a sign, and as such it contains a subliminal but very definite message. Verbally, it might be expressed this way: \u201cI, the greengrocer XY, live here and I know what I must do. I behave in the manner expected of me. I can be depended upon and am beyond reproach. I am obedient and therefore I have the right to be left in peace.\u201d This message, of course, has an addressee: it is directed above, to the greengrocer\u2019s superior, and at the same time it is a shield that protects the greengrocer from potential informers.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Trump aspires to a state of affairs in which lies have to be accepted unquestioningly\u2014or else. But we need to notice the steps he is taking to get there, so that the institutions Arendt relies on (the courts, the press, a mobilized and determined citizenry) can do for our country what they did in 1976: recapture, or better un-capture it. Havel\u2019s account of powerlessness under Czech Soviet rule describes a durable state of affairs that offers only a few ways out. Arendt was only describing small-scale lying within a democracy, while Havel is describing an all-encompassing lie, just what Trump has pounded us with as we enter autocracy. But understanding where we are in the cycle\u2014how far within the zone of defactualization\u2014is crucial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Does Havel\u2019s account of Czech conditions in 1978 bear on the US in 2025? Yes. But not because it is a match\u2014rather, it gives a glimpse of what our future might bring, if this were to go on and on and on. Havel himself carefully distinguishes what he lives under from \u201cthe technique of exercising power in traditional dictatorships, [which] contains a necessary element of improvisation.\u201d What we are watching now\u2014and we should be watching very carefully\u2014is just such improvisation. That\u2019s why Frankfurt\u2019s account not just of bullshit but of bluff (and relatedly bluster) is such an important addendum to Arendt\u2019s anatomy of Nixon-era lying and self-deception.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I am grateful that Timothy Snyder (who has some intellectual affinities with Gessen) has provided one phrase to warn us about what is happening now in response to Trump\u2019s bs: \u201canticipatory obedience<\/a>.\u201d Bad as such anticipatory obedience is, though, it is not the only problem. Arendt\u2019s insistence on seeing the facts as they are now (not as we fear they will become if this goes on) helps us see a corollary phenomenon, potentially just as damaging, which we might call anticipatory despair.<\/em> Anticipatory despair preaches to the choir on the left, assuming we have already fallen into a far deeper pit than has yet been dug (maybe it is the left\u2019s equivalent of the right\u2019s \u201cbrokenism<\/a>).\u201d The dean of Columbia\u2019s journalism school recently told students \u201cNobody can protect you \u2026 these are dangerous times<\/a>.\u201d When your dean tells you that, it\u2019s not just an empty flourish, it is a definite speech act, an abdication of responsibility by those who can in fact take meaningful actions to protect their students.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

the harder we all work to restore a sense of reality in the face of lies and self-deception, the sooner the rebuilding can start.<\/p><\/blockquote><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

All across the left, we can see people acting as if we already lived in the turgid miasma of defactualization that Havel was genuinely breathing in 1978. Despairing, and by despairing, giving into the bluff. To the extent that we are willing to state the facts as we know them to be, we still live in the actual world. We still have a judicial system interested in what time a particular plane took off, and when an order reached the government; we still have judges not willing to accept Trump\u2019s \u201cfindings\u201d in an executive order as fact. Although Jeff Bezos\u2019s Washington Post<\/em> will not risk the wrath of the government by printing a 21st<\/sup>-century equivalent of The Pentagon Papers<\/em>, we do still have newspapers willing to file stories and state facts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US in 2025 is neither Vichy France nor Soviet Czechoslovakia. We may, however, still get to the world Havel describes, where various forms of ordinary life will come to seem foolhardy or even rebellious. Havel describes a society where even the silencing of a punk band, Plastic People of the Universe, spoke volumes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Everyone understood that an attack on the Czech musical underground was an attack on a most elementary and important thing, something that in fact bound everyone together: it was an attack on the very notion of living within the truth, on the real aims of life.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

In 2025, however, Trump\u2019s takeover of the Kennedy Center still sparks that most important human reaction in the face of hubris: laughter. People are drawing the inevitable comparisons between Trump and gold-statue-building autocrats elsewhere. Nobody is dying in the street to protect ballet or operas. (And if you reply \u201cyet,\u201d you leave me no choice but to invoke anticipatory despair again.) We can still laugh and resist. Not at the Kennedy Center, but where it matters: successful suits by state AGs and affected parties, leading to judicial rulings freezing parts of Trump\u2019s steaming river of executive orders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Against Anticipatory Despair<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Arendt may have been a pessimist, but she was a clear-eyed one, hopeful even when not optimistic. She ends \u201cLying in Politics\u201d with a reprisal of her main themes: \u201cdeception, self-deception, image making, ideologizing, and defactualization\u201d\u2014and a reminder about their impermanence: \u201cThe halfhearted attempts of the government to circumvent Constitutional guarantees and to intimidate those who have made up their minds not to be intimidated, who would rather go to jail than see their liberties nibbled away, are not enough and probably will not be enough to destroy the Republic.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Arendt was right about Nixon; the Republic stood. Things may yet turn out differently in our own crisis of the republic: Just as Reagan did more damage to the fundamental social safety net that sustains our country than Nixon did, so too Trump has far surpassed Reagan, and made breaches and inroads on civil liberties and freedoms of expression and of basic bodily autonomy that no prior Republican president would have dared.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n
Related readings<\/div>\n\n
\n\n
\n
\n \"\"<\/a> <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n\n
\n Reviews<\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n Against Despair<\/a>\n <\/h5>\n\n
\n \n Eric D. Weitz <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n\n\n\n

In the face of deliberate deception\u2014engendering self-deception and leading to full-on defactualization\u2014we can still offer appeals to shared human frailty, and a belief in the durability of truth. Arendt reminds us that even would-be authoritarian lies, with their utter disregard of reality, do not last. It is that disregard of truth, that phoniness, that makes them inherently unstable. By describing the ways in which America in the 1970s (as again in 2025) fell into a crisis, she reminds us that the strong fabric of laws and a palpable American commitment to human equality and diversity are still present, albeit muted and obscured beneath the blanket of lies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Havel wrote from inside a true authoritarian pit. Those who have been afflicted with anticipatory despair write as if we too were already in an American version: \u201cNobody can protect you\u201d is a haunting refrain and a self-fulfilling prophecy. Any realistic opposition to Trump now involves countering (to borrow Frankfurt\u2019s terms) bullshit and bluff. Arendt helps us identify the core elements and the essential weakness of a government that has lost touch with reality. She offers the road map that will let us skirt the crumbling edge of the pit they have dug for themselves and whomever else they can drag in.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Four months in, the new Trump administration is already moving from self-deception and deception on to \u201cimage making\u201d and \u201cideologizing\u201d; it is fast approaching complete \u201cdefactualization.\u201d <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":31,"featured_media":59722,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1540,2511,714,258,975,28,290],"pbpartner":[],"section":[],"pbseries":[2274],"class_list":["post-59703","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-essays","tag-american-politics","tag-arendt-in-dark-times","tag-authoritarianism","tag-b-sides","tag-hannah-arendt","tag-politics","tag-trump","pbseries-b-sides"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n\u201cLying in Politics\u201d: Hannah Arendt\u2019s Antidote to Anticipatory Despair - Public Books<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Four months in, the new Trump administration is already moving from self-deception and deception on to \u201cimage making\u201d and \u201cideologizing\u201d; it is fast approaching complete \u201cdefactualization.\u201d\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u201cLying in Politics\u201d: Hannah Arendt\u2019s Antidote to Anticipatory Despair - Public Books\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Four months in, the new Trump administration is already moving from self-deception and deception on to \u201cimage making\u201d and \u201cideologizing\u201d; it is fast approaching complete \u201cdefactualization.\u201d\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Public Books\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/Public-Books\/201143656634392\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-21T15:00:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-03-23T16:38:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/luke-stackpoole-gy4s9SQ1RI-unsplash-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1686\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Megan Cummins\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Megan Cummins\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b19bf7ff83a002c3b5052cbd14ee7d42\"},\"headline\":\"\u201cLying in Politics\u201d: Hannah Arendt\u2019s Antidote to Anticipatory Despair\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-21T15:00:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-23T16:38:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":3693,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/05\\\/luke-stackpoole-gy4s9SQ1RI-unsplash-scaled.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"American Politics\",\"Arendt in Dark Times\",\"Authoritarianism\",\"B-Sides\",\"Hannah Arendt\",\"Politics\",\"Trump\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Essays\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\\\/\",\"name\":\"\u201cLying in Politics\u201d: Hannah Arendt\u2019s Antidote to Anticipatory Despair - Public Books\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/05\\\/luke-stackpoole-gy4s9SQ1RI-unsplash-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-21T15:00:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-23T16:38:07+00:00\",\"description\":\"Four months in, the new Trump administration is already moving from self-deception and deception on to \u201cimage making\u201d and \u201cideologizing\u201d; it is fast approaching complete \u201cdefactualization.\u201d\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/05\\\/luke-stackpoole-gy4s9SQ1RI-unsplash-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/05\\\/luke-stackpoole-gy4s9SQ1RI-unsplash-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1686},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201cLying in Politics\u201d: Hannah Arendt\u2019s Antidote to Anticipatory Despair\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"Public Books\",\"description\":\"a magazine of ideas, arts, and scholarship\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Public Books\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/08\\\/pb_logo_2x.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/08\\\/pb_logo_2x.jpg\",\"width\":212,\"height\":362,\"caption\":\"Public Books\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/pages\\\/Public-Books\\\/201143656634392\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/public_books\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b19bf7ff83a002c3b5052cbd14ee7d42\",\"name\":\"Megan Cummins\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u201cLying in Politics\u201d: Hannah Arendt\u2019s Antidote to Anticipatory Despair - Public Books","description":"Four months in, the new Trump administration is already moving from self-deception and deception on to \u201cimage making\u201d and \u201cideologizing\u201d; it is fast approaching complete \u201cdefactualization.\u201d","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u201cLying in Politics\u201d: Hannah Arendt\u2019s Antidote to Anticipatory Despair - Public Books","og_description":"Four months in, the new Trump administration is already moving from self-deception and deception on to \u201cimage making\u201d and \u201cideologizing\u201d; it is fast approaching complete \u201cdefactualization.\u201d","og_url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\/","og_site_name":"Public Books","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/Public-Books\/201143656634392","article_published_time":"2025-05-21T15:00:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-03-23T16:38:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1686,"url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/luke-stackpoole-gy4s9SQ1RI-unsplash-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Megan Cummins","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\/"},"author":{"name":"Megan Cummins","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b19bf7ff83a002c3b5052cbd14ee7d42"},"headline":"\u201cLying in Politics\u201d: Hannah Arendt\u2019s Antidote to Anticipatory Despair","datePublished":"2025-05-21T15:00:52+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-23T16:38:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\/"},"wordCount":3693,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/luke-stackpoole-gy4s9SQ1RI-unsplash-scaled.jpg","keywords":["American Politics","Arendt in Dark Times","Authoritarianism","B-Sides","Hannah Arendt","Politics","Trump"],"articleSection":["Essays"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\/","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\/","name":"\u201cLying in Politics\u201d: Hannah Arendt\u2019s Antidote to Anticipatory Despair - Public Books","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/luke-stackpoole-gy4s9SQ1RI-unsplash-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2025-05-21T15:00:52+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-23T16:38:07+00:00","description":"Four months in, the new Trump administration is already moving from self-deception and deception on to \u201cimage making\u201d and \u201cideologizing\u201d; it is fast approaching complete \u201cdefactualization.\u201d","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/luke-stackpoole-gy4s9SQ1RI-unsplash-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/luke-stackpoole-gy4s9SQ1RI-unsplash-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":1686},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201cLying in Politics\u201d: Hannah Arendt\u2019s Antidote to Anticipatory Despair"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/","name":"Public Books","description":"a magazine of ideas, arts, and scholarship","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#organization","name":"Public Books","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/pb_logo_2x.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/pb_logo_2x.jpg","width":212,"height":362,"caption":"Public Books"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/Public-Books\/201143656634392","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/public_books\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b19bf7ff83a002c3b5052cbd14ee7d42","name":"Megan Cummins"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59703","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/31"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59703"}],"version-history":[{"count":23,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59703\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":65391,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59703\/revisions\/65391"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/59722"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59703"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59703"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59703"},{"taxonomy":"pbpartner","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pbpartner?post=59703"},{"taxonomy":"section","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/section?post=59703"},{"taxonomy":"pbseries","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pbseries?post=59703"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}