{"id":54302,"date":"2023-11-22T10:00:21","date_gmt":"2023-11-22T16:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/?p=54302"},"modified":"2026-01-16T20:10:59","modified_gmt":"2026-01-17T02:10:59","slug":"this-is-your-brain-on-books","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\/","title":{"rendered":"This Is Your Brain on Books"},"content":{"rendered":"

The subtle Saint Anselm, a Benedictine monk, treated reading as a form of communion. In his time, the 11th<\/sup> century, readers often consumed books differently than they do today. A common form of monastic reading, for example, was lectio divina<\/em>, which monks treated\u2014as Christopher de Hamel says in The Manuscripts Club<\/em>, a group biography of manuscript lovers\u2014as \u201can act of devotion, like prayer.\u201d The reader would open a religious text to a random page, then prayerfully study the passage to see what message God had chosen for him now.1<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

This form of reading, de Hamel says, is one reason why so many medieval manuscripts have richly decorated pages. The decorations \u201chelped impress a page visually in the reader\u2019s memory,\u201d helping him to meditate later upon the revelatory passage. We can see from this example how an era\u2019s methods of reading affect the look and feel of its books. (And how they are valued. Anselm indicated in his correspondence that he preferred a faithfully copied but incomplete book over a badly copied but complete one\u2014which might seem puzzling to modern readers, who read from front to back and don\u2019t want to miss the reveal that the narrator killed Roger Ackroyd.)<\/p>\n

De Hamel\u2019s book is a group biography, reaching back to the Middle Ages and forward to the 20th<\/sup> century, of the old and affable brotherhood (and sisterhood) of manuscript lovers. He chooses, as representatives of this group, a selection of influential readers, collectors, and sellers\u2014including Anselm (ca.1033\u20131109), who rose, after the Norman Invasion of 1066, to become the archbishop of Canterbury; Jean, duc de Berry (1340\u20131416), a French toff who commissioned gold-and-lapis manuscripts that lived up to the luxury he lolled in; Vespasiano da Bisticci (ca.1422\u201398), an Italian bookseller whose writings tell us about the world of manuscripts in the early age of print; Constantine Simonides (ca.1824\u201390), a forger and confidence man whose counterfeits fed the voracious appetites of British museums at the height of the empire; and Belle da Costa Greene (1879\u20131950), a personal librarian and collector for the wealthy who\u2014passing as white in Gilded Age New York\u2014raised the bar for rare book collecting in the United States and curated the collections of the Morgan Library. They\u2019re a motley group: princes, polymaths, rabbis, saints, and scoundrels.<\/p>\n

The usual way to write books about people who love books is a genre that we might call, after one best-selling title, \u201cA Gentle Madness.\u201d2<\/a><\/sup> These are catalogs of the oddball adventures of the bibliomaniacs and bibliographic detectives who, consumed by an acquisitive hunger for rarities or mysteries or prestige, fall down strange rabbit holes and make fabulous finds.<\/p>\n

De Hamel could easily have written this book as another entry in the genre. Instead, he wrote a love story. The madhouse is a place of isolation, and his interest is with community: with the passion for art, for learning, for nerdy minutiae, for history still living and breathing on the page, that brings manuscript lovers together. If you can imagine shedding tears because a manuscript is so exquisite, then this is a book about your people.<\/p>\n

A recurring theme of The Manuscripts Club<\/em> is the many different ways, over the years, we\u2019ve approached reading and construed ourselves as readers. During meals at Anselm\u2019s abbey, one of the monks would read a book aloud while the others ate and listened; for instance, the Moralia<\/em>, a medieval discourse on the Book of Job that offered lessons for monastic life from Job\u2019s surrender to suffering. (\u201cWhat else then does Eliu mean by bread, but the pleasures of this life? For after having stated the power of temptation, he immediately subjoined, His bread becomes abominable to him in his life, and to his soul the food which before it desired:<\/em> because, in truth, all the sweetness he used before to enjoy from the prosperity of his life, afterwards becomes bitter by the power of temptation.\u201d3<\/a><\/sup> A suitably severe accompaniment to a meal of bread and water, which might, after all, be eaten with inappropriate indulgence.)4<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Other readers absorbed books through memorization. De Hamel describes Jewish readers who praise the example of great scholars like Judah bar Ezekiel (220\u201399), who reportedly memorized so many texts that he \u201callowed himself the leisure to pray only once every thirty days in order to have time in the meanwhile to rehearse all [the] knowledge in his mind.\u201d<\/p>\n

Still others treated books as treasures or relics. They kept them in the same collections that they used to hold, say, purported thorns from the Crown of Thorns. And they brought the acts of devotion that they used for other religious objects\u2014touching, kissing, handling\u2014into their rituals of reading. (My favorite anecdote about the haptics of reading doesn\u2019t appear in the book: John, Duke of Bavaria, called John the Pitiless [1374\u20131425], was murdered with a poisoned book. That\u2019s the story, anyway: that one of his underlings painted poison onto his prayer book, which killed the reader because, in that time and place, you caressed a prayer book and kissed the pages.)5<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

In short, the manuscripts club of the title is a cohort of infinite variety. Readers have used manuscripts as oracles, artworks, knowledge engines, status symbols, jewelry. One conclusion that we might draw from this history is that reading itself is infinitely various: that the death of reading\u2014a topic of feverish op-eds about AI and TikTok and declining post-lockdown test scores\u2014has been greatly exaggerated.6<\/a><\/sup> The very technologies that critics decry as fatal threats to reading are just giving people new ways to construe themselves as readers: the trope connoisseurs of BookTok, the doomscrollers of social media, the textual poachers of fan fiction.7<\/a><\/sup> And if you like the sound of the old readerly customs described above\u2014well, as de Hamel says, the manuscripts club is always looking for new members.<\/p>\n

Another new book out this season, Adrian Johns\u2019s The Science of Reading<\/em>, pairs curiously well as a bookend with de Hamel\u2019s to the act of reading. Johns seeks to explain how we read; de Hamel seeks to explain why. Johns focuses on the part of reading that happens between the eyes and the brain; de Hamel, the part of reading that happens between the world and the reader. Johns emphasizes solitude and science; de Hamel, community and, metaphorically, magic.
\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n

reading shapes the thinking of book lovers in ways that go beyond merely what they read.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/figure>\n


\nJohns offers other reasons for rejecting the idea that new technologies are driving reading to irrelevance. After all, reading shaped (and trained) those technologies no less than, say, Boolean algebra. The science\u2014and social science\u2014of information emerged from our efforts to understand reading. It isn\u2019t possible to remove the foundation from that house. The Science of Reading<\/em> starts around 1870, when a new breed of scientist started to ask\u2014in the words of a later researcher, Edmund Burke Huey\u2014\u201cJust what, indeed, do we do, with eye and mind and brain and nerves, when we read?\u201d Reading occupies a strange position in today\u2019s world, being at once physiologically unnecessary and culturally central. Language<\/em> is natural\u2014we produce language automatically, as children, and we know of no human societies that lacked language\u2014but reading <\/em>is artificial. It had (and has) to be invented, like the crank. Plenty of human societies have lacked reading. Despite its artificiality, we, referring to participants in the modern West, consider reading to be an essential skill and spend a lot of time trying to figure out how to make people read more and better. \u201cReading is a good thing,\u201d Johns writes. \u201cWe like to believe that it is a fundamental element of any modern, enlightened, and free society. We may even think of it as the<\/em> fundamental element. It has long been standard to identify the emergence of contemporary virtues like democracy, secularism, science, and tolerance with the spread of literacy that occurred in the wake of Johannes Gutenberg\u2019s invention of printing in the fifteenth century.\u201d<\/p>\n

The fact that reading isn\u2019t hardwired directly into the human brain is one of the things that the scientists in Johns\u2019s book had to discover. They did much of their work by hooking people up to machines that might have come from a James Whale film and recording their physiological functions as they read all kinds of texts. They learned that the eye, when reading, doesn\u2019t move smoothly, but in saccades<\/em>, or little jumps.8<\/a><\/sup> They learned that people read full words faster than they read individual characters. They learned that specific letters in the alphabet are variously hard and easy to read. (The letter e<\/em> is remarkably difficult, it turns out.) They learned about the effects on reading speed of fonts, layouts, styles of punctuation, and, of course, hard drugs.<\/p>\n

And they came up with policy proposals based on their research. One scientist proposed in 1885 that we eliminate either uppercase or lowercase letters, since combining them was \u201cmore of a hurt than help to the eye and brain\u201d; that we replace punctuation marks with lengths of spaces that indicated lengths of pauses; that we take the dot off the letter i; and that we get rid of the letters x<\/em>, q<\/em>, and c<\/em>. This, he said, would make us all not just better readers but better thinkers. Another, in 1902, proposed that we remove the windows from streetcars, since looking outside while the carriage was moving must be \u201cruinous to the delicate muscles of the eyes.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n

In 1960, Wayne Booth, soon to be a famous literary scholar, published in the Journal of Developmental Reading<\/em> a satire of this kind of quantitative research. \u201cI sincerely pitied Mr. E. B. White when he confessed recently, with no apparent shame, that he is a slow reader,\u201d he wrote in the character of a devotee of reading optimization.<\/p>\n

Since I am a very fast reader myself, the pity didn\u2019t strike me until three seconds of reading-time later, when I was reading something else, but when it struck it struck hard. I think I read White\u2019s statement in The New Yorker<\/em>, sometime during the last six months, about two-thirds of the way down the far right-hand column. With the photographic memory I have developed in learning to read so fast, I can see<\/em> White\u2019s statement exactly where it fell on the page.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The speaker might have considered, but didn\u2019t, having odd little images, like knights battling snails, painted in the margins of the page, the better to memorize the text in the manner of medieval readers. The same satire describes a researcher who hooked himself up to a machine and measured his physiological responses while reading, for the first time, the salacious novel Lady Chatterley\u2019s Lover<\/em>. (After conducting the experiment, he ran off with two of his secretaries, never to be seen again.)9<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n

\n\n
Related readings<\/div>\n\n
\n\n
\n
\n \"\"<\/a> <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n\n
\n Reviews<\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n \u201cAn Extraordinarily Metal Way to Be\u201d: Authorship and Medieval Women<\/a>\n <\/h5>\n\n
\n \n \"\" <\/a>\n \n Katherine Churchill <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

Easy as it is to find humor in some of these scholarly detours, the study of reading and the mind had far-reaching effects in the real world. Generous funding for public libraries from Gilded Age plutocrats (those were the days), which the 1 percent believed would save democracy. A public education system that gave reading pride of place among the three R\u2019s. A school textbook industry so corrupt and venal that Upton Sinclair wrote an expos\u00e9 about it as his follow-up to The Jungle<\/em>. Attempts by politicians and librarians to expand library access for ordinary Americans\u2014and to bar library access for other<\/em> ordinary Americans, showing how powerful they believed reading to be. \u201cRead-ins\u201d at public libraries in the 1930s and 1940s, in which Black readers would request library cards, get denied, politely insist, and then get arrested for their cheek. Johns traces these effects all the way up to the \u201creading wars\u201d of the 1960s, Sesame Street<\/em> in the 1970s, and Reading First, a flagship initiative of No Child Left Behind, in the 2000s.10<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

\u201cOne must learn to read in self-defense,\u201d said one of the scholars in The Science of Reading<\/em>, describing the importance of basic literacy.11<\/a><\/sup> That remains true today, though the problems of literacy that attend our own time are beyond what he could have imagined: how to recognize bots, how to discuss a subject that a government is algorithmically censoring, how to know the difference between understanding something and predicting the next word in a string.<\/p>\n

Though he does discuss Claude Shannon, the father of information theory, Johns doesn\u2019t mention that Shannon took a youthful interest in cryptanalysis after reading a detective story and continued to reference detective stories in later years as he worked out his ideas about information. (In the early 1950s, for instance, he tested his intuitions about probability and communication with a noir story by Raymond Chandler, \u201cPickup on Noon Street.\u201d He spelled out a sentence, letter by letter, to his wife and research assistant, Betty. After each letter, she guessed what the next would be. Eventually, demonstrating the predictability of communication if you have a large enough sample text, she was correctly guessing three letters at once. A S-M-A-L-L O-B-L-O-N-G R-E-A-D-I-N-G L-A-M-P O-N T-H-E D \u2026 E-S-K. Shannon figured that the letters we can predict aren\u2019t information, because they don\u2019t tell us anything new.)12<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

If you ask, as the New York Times<\/em> did in 2016, \u201cWho cares if Johnny can\u2019t read well, so long as he can multiply?,\u201d you ignore how reading can ignite the passions of children who grow up to become greats in STEM.13<\/a><\/sup> Shannon\u2019s frivolous childhood reading started him on a path that led to his development of information theory, which became an important basis of modern computing.<\/p>\n

Which brings us to the present day: to a book about a community of readers who\u2014even though manuscripts couldn\u2019t be more outdated\u2014found something so wonderful about the materiality of manuscript texts that they preserved them, studied them, and cherished them in every way short of eating them; and another about a community of scientists determined to use the most advanced possible technology to quantify and optimize the raw transmission of text to the brain. If I were to try to be extravagantly topical, I would describe them as a Barbie\/Oppenheimer<\/em> pairing for library lizards. (I think it\u2019s clear which one is Barbie<\/em> and which one is Oppenheimer<\/em>.)<\/p>\n

As I said, I think they\u2019re a great pair, though my own sympathies lie with the book eaters. As Johns himself readily notes, reading entails a much larger set of activities than what goes on in the brain. Death didn\u2019t come in at the eye for John the Pitiless of Bavaria. It came in at the hands and the lips.<\/p>\n

And reading shapes the thinking of book lovers in ways that go beyond merely what<\/em> they read. I remember sitting, in college, in a lecture that the professor was giving extemporaneously, without notes. At one point, he said, \u201cAs I said above \u2026\u201d He was writing the words in his head as he spoke, or at least he was moving through his ideas spatially as one would down a page.14<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Was this oral culture, written culture, or a mix of the two? If we can\u2019t separate the dancer from the dance, what hope do we have of separating reading from the reader?<\/p>\n

  1. A charming novel about lectio divina<\/em> is Barry\u00a0McCrea, The First Verse<\/em> (Carroll & Graf, 2005). \u21a9<\/a><\/li>
  2. Nicholas Basbanes, A Gentle Madness: Bibliophiles, Bibliomanes, and the Eternal Passion for Books<\/em> (Henry Holt, 1995). \u21a9<\/a><\/li>
  3. Gregory the Great, Morals on the Book of Job<\/a><\/em>, trans. John Henry Parker (J.G.F. and J. Rivington, 1844). \u21a9<\/a><\/li>
  4. Anselm had the Moralia<\/em> in his own abbey\u2019s library transcribed, at a fellow monk\u2019s request, to send to an abbey in England (de Hamel 2023, 21\u20132). \u21a9<\/a><\/li>
  5. I\u2019ve heard it suggested that the book might have been a van Eyck (Pers. comm, Hugo van der Velden, Harvard University, 2012). Death via poisoned book is, of course, a plot point in Umberto Eco, The Name of the Rose<\/em> (Harcourt,\u00a0 1983). \u21a9<\/a><\/li>
  6. See, for example, A. O. Scott, \u201cEveryone Likes Reading. Why Are We So Afraid of It?,\u201d New York Times<\/em>, June 21, 2023; and Tristan Justice, \u201cTeens Don\u2019t Read Books Anymore Because They\u2019re Wasting Their Lives on TikTok,\u201d The Federalist<\/em>,<\/u> July 13, 2023. \u21a9<\/a><\/li>
  7. See, for example, Henry Jenkins, Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture<\/em> (Routledge, 1992). \u21a9<\/a><\/li>
  8. This is the case, Johns notes, specifically with alphabetic texts. \u21a9<\/a><\/li>
  9. Wayne Booth, \u201cLady Chatterley\u2019s Lover and the Tachistoscope,\u201d Journal of Developmental Reading<\/em> 3\u20134 (Summer 1960): 232\u20137. \u21a9<\/a><\/li>
  10. Sesame Street<\/em> premiered in November 1969. \u21a9<\/a><\/li>
  11. James McKeen Cattell, \u201cThe School and the Family,\u201d Popular Science Monthly<\/em> (January 1909): 85. \u21a9<\/a><\/li>
  12. Jimmy Soni and Rob Goodman, A Mind at Play: How Claude Shannon Invented the Information Age<\/em> (Simon & Schuster, 2017, 2018): 152\u20133. Johns discusses Shannon\u2019s analyses of redundancy in printed text. \u21a9<\/a><\/li>
  13. The Times<\/em> writer asks this ironically, and I\u2019m cheating a little by making it sound like he asks it straight. But isn\u2019t it part of cultural literacy to check the quotation against the source? David Kipen, \u201cFighting to Reopen a Closed Book,\u201d New York Times<\/em>, December 29, 2016. \u21a9<\/a><\/li>
  14. Edwin Williams, Princeton University, ca. 2005. \u21a9<\/a><\/li><\/ol><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    \u201cReading occupies a strange position in today\u2019s world, being at once physiologically unnecessary and culturally central.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":31,"featured_media":54316,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2497],"tags":[1500,1182,464,461,1042],"pbpartner":[],"section":[1144],"pbseries":[],"class_list":["post-54302","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-reviews","tag-medieval-studies","tag-penguin-press","tag-printscreen","tag-reading","tag-university-of-chicago-press","section-print-screen"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nThis Is Your Brain on Books - Public Books<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"\u201cReading occupies a strange position in today\u2019s world, being at once physiologically unnecessary and culturally central.\u201d\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"This Is Your Brain on Books - Public Books\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u201cReading occupies a strange position in today\u2019s world, being at once physiologically unnecessary and culturally central.\u201d\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Public Books\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/Public-Books\/201143656634392\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-11-22T16:00:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-17T02:10:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Trinity-College-Library.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1707\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Megan Cummins\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Megan Cummins\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b19bf7ff83a002c3b5052cbd14ee7d42\"},\"headline\":\"This Is Your Brain on Books\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-22T16:00:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-17T02:10:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2852,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/11\\\/Trinity-College-Library.jpeg\",\"keywords\":[\"Medieval Studies\",\"Penguin Press\",\"Print\\\/Screen\",\"Reading\",\"University of Chicago Press\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Reviews\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\\\/\",\"name\":\"This Is Your Brain on Books - Public Books\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/11\\\/Trinity-College-Library.jpeg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-22T16:00:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-17T02:10:59+00:00\",\"description\":\"\u201cReading occupies a strange position in today\u2019s world, being at once physiologically unnecessary and culturally central.\u201d\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/11\\\/Trinity-College-Library.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/11\\\/Trinity-College-Library.jpeg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1707},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"This Is Your Brain on Books\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"Public Books\",\"description\":\"a magazine of ideas, arts, and scholarship\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Public Books\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/08\\\/pb_logo_2x.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/08\\\/pb_logo_2x.jpg\",\"width\":212,\"height\":362,\"caption\":\"Public Books\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/pages\\\/Public-Books\\\/201143656634392\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/public_books\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.publicbooks.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b19bf7ff83a002c3b5052cbd14ee7d42\",\"name\":\"Megan Cummins\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"This Is Your Brain on Books - Public Books","description":"\u201cReading occupies a strange position in today\u2019s world, being at once physiologically unnecessary and culturally central.\u201d","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"This Is Your Brain on Books - Public Books","og_description":"\u201cReading occupies a strange position in today\u2019s world, being at once physiologically unnecessary and culturally central.\u201d","og_url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\/","og_site_name":"Public Books","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/Public-Books\/201143656634392","article_published_time":"2023-11-22T16:00:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-17T02:10:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1707,"url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Trinity-College-Library.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Megan Cummins","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\/"},"author":{"name":"Megan Cummins","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b19bf7ff83a002c3b5052cbd14ee7d42"},"headline":"This Is Your Brain on Books","datePublished":"2023-11-22T16:00:21+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-17T02:10:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\/"},"wordCount":2852,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Trinity-College-Library.jpeg","keywords":["Medieval Studies","Penguin Press","Print\/Screen","Reading","University of Chicago Press"],"articleSection":["Reviews"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\/","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\/","name":"This Is Your Brain on Books - Public Books","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Trinity-College-Library.jpeg","datePublished":"2023-11-22T16:00:21+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-17T02:10:59+00:00","description":"\u201cReading occupies a strange position in today\u2019s world, being at once physiologically unnecessary and culturally central.\u201d","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Trinity-College-Library.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Trinity-College-Library.jpeg","width":2560,"height":1707},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/this-is-your-brain-on-books\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"This Is Your Brain on Books"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/","name":"Public Books","description":"a magazine of ideas, arts, and scholarship","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#organization","name":"Public Books","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/pb_logo_2x.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/pb_logo_2x.jpg","width":212,"height":362,"caption":"Public Books"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/Public-Books\/201143656634392","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/public_books\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b19bf7ff83a002c3b5052cbd14ee7d42","name":"Megan Cummins"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54302","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/31"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54302"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54302\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62013,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54302\/revisions\/62013"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/54316"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54302"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54302"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54302"},{"taxonomy":"pbpartner","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pbpartner?post=54302"},{"taxonomy":"section","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/section?post=54302"},{"taxonomy":"pbseries","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.publicbooks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pbseries?post=54302"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}